Mr. Sachs has had a long and multifaceted career in the criminal justice system. After retiring from policing, he transitioned into the legal framework, contributing to the operation of the courts. In recent years, Mr. Sachs has expanded his skill set by incorporating specialized training in questioned handwriting and document examination, leveraging this expertise to establish a private practice. This venture benefits from his decades of experience in law enforcement and the judicial system. Throughout his career, Mr. Sachs has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to integrity, justice, and public service.

Signature verification in forensic handwriting analysis is a meticulous process aimed at establishing the authenticity of a signature, whether genuine or forged. I start by comparing the questioned signature with known samples from the individual, meticulously analyzing characteristics such as line quality, letter formation, pen pressure, writing speed, and distinctive personal traits—such as the shape of a "t" or the looping of an "l." Utilizing tools like magnifying glasses and microscopes, I seek signs of tracing, hesitation, or irregular strokes that may suggest forgery. This analysis goes beyond simple comparison; I also assess whether the signature aligns with its context, including factors like the date or type of document. Ultimately, my objective is to deliver a well-supported expert opinion, frequently summarized in a report for clients or court proceedings, regarding the signature's authenticity.

Anonymous writing refers to texts, such as threatening letters or notes, where the author intentionally conceals their identity. As a forensic handwriting expert, I analyze these samples by comparing them to known writings from potential suspects, scrutinizing features such as letter shapes, connections, spelling peculiarities, and even the grip on a pen. I utilize tools like microscopes to identify subtle details, such as shaky lines or unique flourishes, that could link the writing to a specific individual. My analysis goes beyond handwriting; I also assess word choices and grammatical patterns that may correspond with a suspect’s style. The objective is to narrow down or identify the author with compelling evidence, often for inclusion in reports or court cases.

As a forensic document examiner, I meticulously analyze documents by scrutinizing their physical characteristics and written elements to determine authenticity, alterations, or origins. I begin with a visual inspection, utilizing tools such as microscopes and specialized lighting to assess paper texture, ink types, and printing techniques for signs of tampering, including erased lines, added content, or inconsistent fonts. When evaluating handwriting, I compare signatures or notes to known samples, examining stroke patterns, pressure variations, and unique features such as misspellings. Additionally, I may conduct tests for age, looking for indicators like faded ink or worn edges, to verify if the document aligns with its asserted date. The outcome is a comprehensive opinion, supported by evidence, regarding the document’s authenticity, often intended for legal proceedings.

As a forensic document examiner, I use a variety of tools in my lab to analyze documents and uncover the truth. I rely on a digital microscope to zoom in on tiny details like ink lines or paper fibers. UV and infrared lights help reveal hidden alterations, such as faded ink or erased marks that aren’t visible to the naked eye. Digital cameras and scanners capture high-resolution images for comparison or court displays. Basic tools like rulers and protractors measure angles or alignments, all working together to spot fakes or alterations.